CONTINUEThis site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.

 

America’s Stalled Tax Treaties

By TreatyPro Editorial
June 24, 2014


Double tax avoidance agreements rarely generate controversy. Indeed, dozens of them are approved by legislatures around the world on an almost weekly basis with few people actually noticing. In the United States however, the passage of five double tax agreements has ground to a halt and is proving to be yet another source of friction between Republicans and Democrats in a highly partisan Congress. This feature looks at the reason why.

The pending DTAs and protocols include a proposed tax treaty with Chile, signed in 2010, the ratification of which was said to represent an important milestone in lowering tax barriers to US companies operating in Latin America; a proposed DTA amendment with Hungary, also signed in 2010, which would close a "treaty shopping" loophole in the existing treaty; and Swiss and Luxembourg DTA protocols, both signed in 2009, which would, among other measures, update the existing information exchange provisions with those countries.

It has been pointed out that, in particular, "the Swiss DTA protocol would specifically protect against 'fishing expeditions' by either country, while enabling the US Government to collect US tax revenues from hidden offshore accounts of US tax evaders." The Swiss protocol was ratified by Switzerland on March 5, 2012.

However, the passage of these tax treaties through Congress has been blocked since 2011, largely through the efforts of one man: Senator Rand Paul, the Kentucky Republican.

Paul has cited privacy concerns surrounding the exchange of US taxpayer information within both the tax treaties and under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).


Treasury Reassurances

Back on February 26, 2014, at a United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations hearing on tax treaties that have yet to be approved by Congress, the Treasury Deputy Assistant Secretary (International Tax Affairs) Robert Stack gave assurances that the Administration is "strongly committed to ensuring that information provided to treaty partners will be strictly protected and treated as confidential."

Stack pointed out to the Committee that "one of the critical principles under today's existing international standards for information exchange upon request is that the country receiving information must ensure that exchanged information is kept confidential and only used for legitimate tax administration purposes."

"Before entering into an agreement," he added, "Treasury and the IRS must be satisfied that the foreign jurisdiction has the necessary legal safeguards in place to protect exchanged information and that adequate penalties apply to any breach of that confidentiality. Even if an information exchange agreement is in effect, the IRS will not exchange information with a country if the IRS determines that the country is not complying with its obligations under the agreement to protect the confidentiality of information."

In addition, he concluded: "The IRS will not exchange any return information with a country that does not impose tax on the income being reported, because the information could not be used for the enforcement of taxes laws within that country."

Stack also emphasized that, in establishing the US's negotiating priorities, Treasury's primary objective is the conclusion of tax treaties that will provide the greatest benefit to the US and to US taxpayers, and that it actively pursues opportunities to establish new tax treaty relationships with countries in which US businesses encounter unrelieved double taxation with respect to their investments.


Paul’s Privacy Concerns

However, seemingly not reassured by Stack’s testimony, Paul continued to express his view in a May 7, 2014 letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D – Nevada), that the five treaties would flout the privacy rights of US individuals and US expats, and that these concerns outweigh any economic benefits that might accrue as a result of the treaties. In the letter, he confirmed that he will continue to block the passage of the tax treaties in question.

Previous treaties, he wrote, "were more focused on information specific to suspicions of tax fraud, while requiring that serious allegations of wrongdoing were grounded in evidence. It appears these treaties may end up being the tool that implements FATCA," which requires foreign financial institutions to "send the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) the private records of overseas American bank account holders – no questions asked, and no reasonable suspicion, due process, or court order required."

While reiterating that he does not "condone tax cheats," he continued that he cannot "support a law that punishes every American in pursuit of a few tax cheats, … (and he will) object to any unanimous consent request, motion, or waiver of any rule in relation to these treaties or any related measure."

An extract of Paul’s letter follows below:

I write to express my opposition to the five tax treaties approved in April 2014 by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (Treaty Docs 112-1, 111-8, 111-7, 112-8, and 112-5).

The American right to privacy is perpetually being diminished. Our government is monitoring our email and cell phones, and they’re increasingly monitoring our bank account records –among the most private of an individual’s possessions.  An individual’s bank account is the epitome of who they are as a private citizen; a bank account reveals where someone is shopping, what foods they like, the medicines they’re taking, the doctors they’re visiting, and the places they’re traveling.  At the very least, every American – whether at home or abroad – deserves to have their Fourth Amendment rights protected.

Previous tax treaties were more focused on information specific to suspicions of tax fraud while requiring that serious allegations of tax wrongdoing were grounded in evidence.  However, these new bulk collection treaties demand Americans’ records under a vague standard that allows the government to access personal financial information that “may be relevant” through information exchanges between the U.S. and foreign governments – a standard extended to other governments, as well.  This new, much lower and ambiguous threshold allows the government to access bank records for hardly any reason at all.

It also appears that these treaties may end up being the tool that implements a domestic law known as the Foreign Accounts Tax Compliance Act, or FATCA.  In short, this law punishes every single overseas financial institution with a 30 percent withholding tax unless they send the IRS the private records of overseas American bank holders – no questions asked, and no reasonable suspicion, due process, or court order required.  This law has forced many foreign banks to simply deny services to Americans rather than deal with the burdens and costs of compliance with FATCA, thus impeding foreign investment and risking economic harm.

To be clear, I certainly do not condone tax cheats, but I can’t support a law that endangers regular foreign investment and punishes every American in pursuit of a few tax cheats.  Most importantly, I cannot support a bulk collection tax treaty that has complete disregard for the important protections provided to every American by the Fourth Amendment.

Accordingly, I will object to any unanimous consent request, motion, or waiver of any rule in relation to these treaties or any related measure.  Thank you for protecting my rights in regards to this matter.


Business Concerns

In her testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in February 2014, Nancy L. McLernon, President and CEO of the Organization for International Investment, pointed out that failure to approve agreements in an expeditious manner has a number of negative consequences for the United States economically.

“The failure of the Senate to ratify many of these agreements in the past few years has slowed the progress on tax treaties with other countries … (and) the lingering ratification process also scares away potential new investment from firms, based in proposed treaty countries,” she warned.

During the same hearing, William Reinsch, from the National Foreign Trade Council (NFTC) concurred, noting that, "if US enterprises cannot enjoy the reduced foreign withholding rates offered by a tax treaty, non-creditable high levels of foreign withholding tax leave them at a competitive disadvantage relative to traders and investors from other countries that do enjoy the treaty benefits."

"If US businesses are going to maintain a competitive position around the world, treaty policy should prevent multiple or excessive levels of foreign tax on cross border investments, particularly if their foreign competitors already enjoy that advantage," he added.

The NFTC has since emphasized that adoption of these DTAs “will ensure US competitiveness abroad and foreign direct investment into the US”, and that the tax treaties are critical to the US business community. A letter co-signed by a number of prominent US business organisation, including the Business Roundtable, Information Technology Industry Council, National Association of Manufacturers, Organization for International Investment, US Chamber of Commerce and United States Council for International Business says:

"For over eighty years, DTAs have played a critical role in fostering US bilateral trade and investment while protecting US businesses, large and small, from double taxation of the income they earn from selling goods and services in foreign markets. Tax treaties do so primarily by reducing foreign withholding taxes and otherwise restricting the ability of the foreign treaty partner to tax the income of US taxpayers."

"On a reciprocal basis," they add, "DTAs reduce US withholding taxes to encourage foreign companies to invest in the US. Tax treaties help the US economy by allowing US companies to more efficiently conduct their businesses abroad and by making the US more hospitable to foreign investment, which creates and sustains millions of American jobs."

In addition, the letter confirmed that "DTAs contain administrative procedures for US taxpayers, treaty-partner taxpayers, and the US and foreign taxing authorities themselves to resolve disagreements and to assist in the enforcement of the two countries' tax laws. In these and other ways, the US network of over sixty bilateral treaties plays a significant role in advancing the economic interests of the US in the global economy."

The letter also pointed out that DTAs and protocols such as these have routinely been approved by unanimous consent, and that they have already been reported out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee without amendment or reservation.


The Swiss Protocol

On May 22, Paul objected to a request by Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Menendez (D – New Jersey) for a unanimous Senate vote to ratify the pending protocol to the tax treaty with Switzerland.

The Swiss protocol, which was originally negotiated in September 2009, would amend the existing 1996 double taxation agreement. It was sent to the Senate by President Barack Obama in 2011, and has been approved by the Foreign Relations Committee as part of the United States' domestic ratification procedures.

It has been said that the protocol would make it more difficult for Switzerland to refuse requests from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for tax information concerning the US customers of Swiss banks. However, Paul maintains that the protocol is too sweeping.


US DTA Freeze In 2014?

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on June 19 reviewed a new bilateral income tax treaty between the US and Poland, which would replace the existing tax treaty that was signed in 1974, and also an amendment to the income tax treaty signed in 1990 with Spain. Ratification by the committee is not expected until-mid July, according to a staff member.

The committee's vote may be temporarily moot, however, due to Rand Paul’s opposition. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez said bringing each treaty to the Senate floor individually for full debate – as opposed to unanimous consent – is unlikely in 2014, due to "the time frame left before the Senate [has] to deal with the appropriation process."

"It is going to be very difficult to get time on the Senate floor to go through an elaborate process of a debate, where I'm sure virtually no one will come down to the floor to debate the treaties because there will be almost unanimity of opinion," said Menendez.

Menendez added that his committee has expended significant effort in recent months to obtain Senate confirmation of pending income tax treaties and protocols. In February, Senator Benjamin Cardin (D - Maryland) chaired a hearing together with Senator Mike Barrasso (R - Wyoming) on income tax treaties and protocols with Switzerland, Hungary, Luxembourg, Chile, and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The committee approved the five treaties on April 1.

Menendez continued: "Over the last month, senators Cardin, Levin, and I have, on separate occasions, requested unanimous consent for the Swiss and Chile treaties."

"Traditionally tax treaties have enjoyed strong bipartisan support, and I'll continue to urge my colleagues in the Senate to ratify these crucial components of the United States trade and tax policy," he concluded.

Tags: Investment | Invest | Investment | Luxembourg | Compliance | services | enforcement | Internal Revenue Service (IRS) | Hungary | Chile | trade | Switzerland | FATCA | withholding tax | Tax | agreements | United States | business | law | investment | tax


Latest News

Malta Ratifies BEPS Convention

3/5/2018
Malta has become the latest country to ratify the OECD's multilateral convention to counter base erosion and profit shifting.
Read full story

Switzerland Adopts Dispatch On New DTAs

19/4/2018
The Swiss Federal Council has adopted dispatches on a new double tax agreement with Zambia and a protocol to the current agreement with Ecuador.
Read full story

Finnish Lawmakers Call For Termination Of Portuguese DTA

13/4/2018
The Finnish Government has proposed that parliament terminate the 1970 double tax agreement between Finland and Portugal so that Finland can tax the pensions of retired Finnish expats.
Read full story

India Adds BEPS Provisions To Qatar Tax Treaty

29/3/2018
India has approved amendments to its double tax agreement with Qatar.
Read full story

France, Luxembourg Sign New Tax Treaty

22/3/2018
A new tax treaty incorporating the latest international tax standards was signed by France and Luxembourg on March 20.
Read full story

Sweden To Legislate To Adopt BEPS Treaty Changes

22/3/2018
The Swedish Government has approved a bill to ratify the BEPS Multilateral Instrument and has submitted it to parliament.
Read full story

India, Hong Kong Sign Double Tax Deal

20/3/2018
Hong Kong and India on March 19 signed an agreement to avoid double taxation and limit withholding tax rates on passive income at source.
Read full story

US And Liechtenstein To Negotiate Double Tax Treaty

16/3/2018
The governments of Liechtenstein and the United States have recently discussed the possibility of beginning negotiations for a bilateral double tax avoidance treaty.
Read full story

Luxembourg Says EU's Digital Tax Must Be Lawful

13/3/2018
Luxembourg Finance Minister Pierre Gramegna has said that any special tax measures against large digital companies should respect European Union law.
Read full story

Barbados, Australia Eyeing Double Tax Pact

7/2/2018
Barbados's Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade, Maxine McClean, has stressed the importance of tax cooperation with Australia in recent comments at a reception marking Australia Day.
Read full story

Netherlands Confirms Tax Treaty Negotiation Priorities

31/1/2018
The Netherlands will seek to resume discussions towards double taxation avoidance treaties with several countries in 2018, including the United States, the Government has said.
Read full story

Barbados Commits To Amend Tax Treaties To Block BEPS

26/1/2018
Barbados has become one of the latest jurisdictions to sign the BEPS multilateral instrument to incorporate provisions within its tax treaties to counter base erosion and profit shifting.
Read full story

Greece Raises BEPS Concerns With Bulgaria

25/1/2018
The heads of the Greek and Bulgarian tax authorities have met to discuss ways in which bilateral cooperation can be boosted with a view to reducing levels of tax avoidance and evasion, particularly with respect to Greek companies shifting profits to Bulgaria.
Read full story

Japan, Iceland Sign Double Tax Agreement

16/1/2018
Japan's Ministry of Finance has reported the signing of a double tax agreement with Iceland in Reykjavik.
Read full story

Cyprus, Saudi Arabia Negotiate Double Tax Agreement

4/1/2018
Cyprus's Ministry of Finance says the island has signed a double tax agreement with Saudi Arabia with respect to taxes on income and for the prevention of tax evasion.
Read full story

Curacao Signs BEPS Multilateral Instrument

2/1/2018
Curacao, the low-tax Caribbean territory, has become the latest jurisdiction to sign the BEPS multilateral instrument to revise tax treaties to counter base erosion and profit shifting.
Read full story

Jersey Ratifies BEPS Multilateral Instrument

26/12/2017
Jersey has become one of only three jurisdictions to ratify the BEPS multilateral instrument to revise tax treaties to counter base erosion and profit shifting.
Read full story

Swiss Gov't Agrees Double Tax Avoidance Deal With Kosovo

16/11/2017
The Swiss Federal Council has adopted a dispatch on the implementation of a new double tax agreement with Kosovo.
Read full story

UK Reiterates 'Unwavering Support' for Gibraltar

6/11/2017
The UK's Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Stephen Barclay, said the UK's support for Gibraltar is "unwavering," in a recent address to mark Gibraltar Day.
Read full story

Switzerland Adopts Dispatch On Pakistan DTA

26/10/2017
The Swiss Federal Council has adopted a dispatch on the implementation of a new double taxation agreement with Pakistan.
Read full story

OECD's Action 5 BEPS Work Producing 'Tangible Results'

18/10/2017
Countries have made substantial progress in ensuring that their preferential tax regimes do not give rise to base erosion and profit shifting issues, according to the OECD's new peer review report under Action 5 of the BEPS Action Plan.
Read full story

New Japan-Denmark DTA To Waive Cross-Border Tax

16/10/2017
The Japanese and Danish governments announced on October 11 that they had signed a new agreement for the avoidance of double taxation in Tokyo.
Read full story

Canada Praised After BEPS Minimum Standard Peer Review

6/10/2017
Canada is largely compliant with the BEPS minimum standard on improving tax dispute resolution, one of the first ever OECD peer reviews has found, but it needs to make a number of changes to be regarded fully compliant.
Read full story

Japan's NTA Releases Guidance On MAP Article

6/10/2017
Japan's National Tax Agency has released guidance on the mutual agreement procedure article found in many of Japan's double tax treaties.
Read full story

MAP Peer Reviews Released For UK, US, Others

2/10/2017
The OECD has released its first peer review reports of mutual agreement procedure frameworks in Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, Switzerland, the UK, and the US.
Read full story


More News